Home > Java Error > Java Error During Db2 Version 10 Cm To Nfm

Java Error During Db2 Version 10 Cm To Nfm

Regards, Wim -----End Original Message----- The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain CONFIDENTIAL material. If DB2 Client or DB2 Connect gets SQL1598N after DB2 V10 CM9, review Link of DB2 Connect Documentation to Reactivate the server side license again and follow instructions. But for today, I’m most interested in the 366 and 376. This problem is the first one we have had that has been related to the APPLCOMPAT set to V11R1. this content

If the DISABLE_IMPCAST_NJV option is specified on any member of a data sharing environment, it is recommended to specify it on all members. The reason is that we calculated the risk so small and so simple to fallback a specific application or dynamic application to v10R1 So far we have 44 out of 95 We know this works well for packages, but do we need to change settings for this to make it work for dynamic SQL as well? An entirely separate issue is how EXISTING v9/v10 functions behave in V11 – notably CHAR() VARCHAR() and CAST() If you had no problems in V10, you should be okay in V11

Starting with V11, SQL error will no longer be issued. ** ** Application will no longer recieve SQLCODE for this Statement. ** ** ** ** QW0366FN = 1102 ** ** Indicates PM17665 DB2 for z/OS server authorization processing, relative to remote (via DRDA) DB2 for z/OS client applications only, has been changed to behave consistently with the current behavior relative to remote Michael Regauer Sitz: Düsseldorf, Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Düsseldorf HRB 37996 Von: Wim Ruarus [mailto:[login to unmask email] Gesendet: Montag, 21.

QW0366FN = 7 A QW0366FN 7 record indicates that DB2 for z/OS server issued a SQLCODE -301 for incompatible data type conversion from string data type (e.g. If you have issues with DDF, you have a parameter (zparm)DDF_COMPATIBILITY which can be set to V11 Priorso such programs continue to generate SQLs as in V10. But it was a nightmare for us because of our usage of views and native mode SPs with tons of ALIASES and Synonyms. In addition, be careful.

IT16113901 WHEN QUERY HAS TABLE FUNCTION HAVING JOIN ON SAME TABLE IT16112A CORRELATED SCALAR SUBQUERY IN AN UPDATE STATEMENT MAY NOT CORRECTLY RETURN SQL0811N IT16108DB2 PATTERN FAILS TO CREATE THE DATABASE They have actually closed a couple of loop-holes, where “bad” data could be accepted and processed. The new ZPARM option allows you to disable implicit casting for such client applications running in V10 NFM and in V11 with application compatibility equal to V10R1 while you implement corrective When examining IFCID 0366 trace records collected, an application programmer who finds any records with a QW0366FN value of 7 can take a close look at the input string which is

I have found some topics about this in the Installation and Migration Guide, the DB2 Commands Reference and the Application Programming and SQL Reference and of course on the IDUG site. So today I tested a BIND using APPLCOMPAT(V10R1) and wow, it worked ! ☺ So now we have a workaround but still the IBMers have to solve it as it should Description: cid:[login to unmask email]: humana.com 123 East Main Street Louisville, KY 40202 Humana.com (502) 714-8615, (502) 476-2538 From: Wim Ruarus [mailto:[login to unmask email] Sent: Monday, March 21, 2016 7:41 After upgrading to DB2 10 CM in a test DB2 region, we are getting an SQL -180 when a JAVA (JIS) formatted timestamp (2013-08-23 09:10:00.000000) is sent from a distributed app.

Become a partnerServices on our websiteCURSOR Software AGDB2DB2 product editionsDB2 information materialDB2 announcementsDB2 price listsDB2 license calculatorDB2 license textsDB2 inquiries & ordersInformixInformix product editionsInformix comparison tableInformix information materialInformix customer referencesInformix announcementsInformix DDF_COMPATIBILITY options can be specified individually or together. Pretty conclusive to us. But I know we use a ton of views in our application code (COBOL programs bound) and we’re not having the problems.

Here I strongly disagree with Chris because of all the issues we had going from V10 to V11. news If it does, then this fix probably is the issue. All COBOL programs bound to use the Synonym. PM48741 V10 only. ** ** ** **  QW0366FN = 4 ** ** A QW0366FN 4 record indicates that the statement uses the ** ** word ARRAY_EXISTS as an unqualified user-defined function

E-mail transmission is not guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or may contain viruses in transmission. Somehow you will have to work out a way to save the data, analyse it to get to the root cause, and then, finally, fix the problem(s). IT15114A 'DB2 GET DB CFG SHOW DETAIL' FROM THE CLP MAY REPORT AN INCORRECT 'CURRENT VALUE' FOR DECFLT_ROUNDING IT15109DB2IUPDT or DB2IUPGRADE FAILS WHEN BACKUP OF SQLLIB FAILS IT15107DB2CONVERT FAILS WITH SQL0802N have a peek at these guys You have made too many good contributions to have to apologize for a doc error that wasn’t yours Roger Hecq Working together for better solutions Verizonwireless VZW DB2 DBA team 2000

I have found some topics about this in the Installation and Migration Guide, the DB2 Commands Reference and the Application Programming and SQL Reference and of course on the IDUG site.But It seems odd that thetimestamp format would be rejected suddenly in DB2 10, as it seems like a high impact change not to be specifically highlighted in the migration documentation. Local fix Problem summary Problem conclusion Temporary fix Comments APAR Information APAR numberII14619 Reported component namePB LIB INFO ITE Reported component IDINFOPBLIB Reported release001 StatusINTRAN PENoPE HIPERNoHIPER Special AttentionNoSpecatt Submitted date2011-02-18

I don’t know if IBM has created a PTF yet for it or not.

This new server authorization behavior essentially represents more stringent authorization requirements that must now be met. Document information More support for: DB2 for z/OS Software version: A10 Reference #: PM92838 Modified date: 25 February 2015 Site availability Site assistance Contact and feedback Need support? This behavior is incorrect for a CAST    ** ** and is valid for TIMESTAMP built-in function only. Now I like to call these “BIFCIDs” because they are triggered whenever a BIF is used that will behave differently than it is currently used when moving to the next release

I apologize... (wipes egg off face) Thank you, Patrick Bossman Michael Arlebrandt SV: Application Compatibility in DB2 11 z/OS April 7, 2016 03:29 PM (in response to Patrick Bossman) Thanks Patrik, The client driver corrects the invalid character data, converting to a numeric, before sending to DB2. It is ignored for any non-Java IBM Data Server driver at any higher level. http://magsuite.com/java-error/java-error-java-lang-classnotfoundexception.html Best regards Michael Arlebrandt Volvo IT Gothenburg From: Chris Hoelscher [mailto:[login to unmask email] Sent: den 21 mars 2016 22:47 To: '[login to unmask email]' Subject: [DB2-L] - RE: Application Compatibility

This problem is the first one we have had that has been related to the APPLCOMPAT set to V11R1.