How can I make a check twice as likely to fail? Like Show 0 Likes(0) Actions 3. When from our code I try to get a read-only connection with this database I get the following exception: java.sql.SQLException: Could not position within a table (informix.systables). To do so, first get the partnum of the table. his comment is here
Posted By: monica toth
Can you please help me in this regard to unlock the table. is that acceptable? hide 6 of 20 (30%) view books My other places GoodReads Scribd WordPress Telecom project IT trends project Human resources project Total Pageviews Octavio Sánchez Huerta. Isam Error: Key Value Locked Read 19 May 10 - ZDNet - IBM software in your home?
Front element shattered, can I have my lens repaired? Results 1 to 4 of 4 Thread: ISAM-113, Error 288 : How to unlock the table ,which is locked by another user. Read Previous news items End of Support Dates IDS 11.10 - 30 Sep 2012 Subscribe to notifications a> Home Member Area About IIUG Help Resources IIUG Insider IIUG Hotspots Informix Links Re: ISAM error: the file is locked in Informix Dynamic Server 11.5 jschellSomeoneStoleMyAlias Mar 23, 2010 6:31 PM (in response to 843859) As a guess - your connection string is wrong.
I don't have much experience in Informix with using locks/interpretingerror messages involving locks. Could Not Do An Indexed Read To Get The Next Row. The owner's username will be listed in the user column of onstat -u The onstat - u output also has a sessid column. at test_db_connectivity.pl line 140Why use lock mode page on a table Hot Network Questions Meaning of "Sue me" Should I list "boredom" as a reason for leaving my previous job in Powered by the IBM Informix software...
If I try to Unlock the table I am gettting an error 288 : Stating that the table is locked by another user. Read 31 May 11 - Smart Grid - The meter data management pitfall utilities are overlooking... Informix Could Not Position Within A File Via An Index Read 20 Sep 10 - planetIDS.com - ITG analyst paper: Cost/Benefit case for IBM Informix as compared to Microsoft SQL Server... Could Not Do A Physical-order Read To Fetch Next Row Informix USELASTCOMMITTED only works with table that has row level locking.
I believe the Informix version is 9.3 and the operating system isRedhat 7.2.Any suggestions are appreciated.Thanks,Monica252: Cannot get system information for table.113: ISAM error: the file is locked. this content Read 16 May 11 - Business Wire - HiT Software Announces DBMoto for Enterprise Integration, Adds Informix. I would say to ask about this on an Informix forum, first, as the issue seems to be more wioth the Driver (or, at least, how you're using it) then it There is generally nothing runningagainst the database except a C/Fortran data ingest program. 107 Isam Error Record Is Locked Informix
Read 14 Mar 12 - BernieSpang.com - International Informix User Group set to meet in San Diego... Informix Lock Mode Rerun the program or query when the table is unlocked.If you get this error (-113) when using a transaction isolation mode of REPEATABLE READ or SERIALIZABLE, and if your Creating color coded playing instruction for xylophones What does "Ojo con los hombres" mean in this context?
The application does connected to the database,Not at that point it isn't. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. Five columns shown are database name, table name, lock type, owner of the lock (session id) and waiting session id if any for the locked object. Kiel "esperantigi" Stack Exchange? / How to "esperantize" Stack Exchange?
Document information More support for: Informix Servers Software version: 10.0, 11.1, 11.5 Operating system(s): AIX, HP-UX, Linux, OS X, Platform Independent, Solaris, Windows Reference #: 1327818 Modified date: 26 June 2014 hide 4 of 10 (40%) view books GoodReads 2014 2014 Reading Challenge Octavio has read 6 books toward his goal of 20 books. Awesome Inc. check over here Re: ISAM error: the file is locked in Informix Dynamic Server 11.5 masijade Mar 24, 2010 7:30 AM (in response to 843859) deeps2009 wrote: No, that is not the case.